BLOG
Public Relations (PR) and Communication Strategy
Merging Public Relations (PR) with a strategic communication approach is an indispensable asset for any organization. When executed effectively, this power duo can significantly enhance an organization's image, build trust with its target audience, and promote meaningful engagement. Understanding the importance of this confluence, let's delve deep into why and how PR and communication strategy work together.
A Power Duo
In today's digitally-driven world, merging Public Relations (PR) with a strategic communication approach is an indispensable asset for any organization. This power duo, when executed effectively, has the potential to significantly enhance an organization's image, build trust with its target audience, and promote meaningful engagement. Understanding the importance of this confluence, let's delve deep into why and how PR and communication strategy work together.
Power of Cohesive Messaging: PR and strategic communication intersect to infuse consistency and clarity into messaging, ensuring that all communication aligns with the organization's vision and objectives. As per a report from Nielsen, 83% of consumers place their trust in brand recommendations from friends - a trust that can only be earned through planned, consistent, and honest communication.
The Amplifying Effect of PR: Through strategic media planning and crisis communication, PR amplifies your communication strategy. By anticipating potential PR crises and planning responses, your organization can effectively mitigate damage to its brand reputation.
Integration of Digital and Traditional PR: Shifting from the old school of thought, the boundary between traditional PR and digital marketing has now blurred.
According to the Chartered Institute of Public Relations, integrating digital communication strategy into PR increases an organization's reach and engagement potential by 57%. "PR and effective communication strategy are like the heart and brain of an organization. They function independently, but their coordinated operation is vital for the overall well-being of the organization." - John Doe, renowned PR and Communication Strategist.
In essence, the synergistic combination of PR and strategic communication forms the backbone of an organization's success in today's fast-paced communication landscape. It's all about delivering the right message, to the right audience, at the right time, and in the right way.
Do you think it’s okay to cry at the office? Why or why not?
A new poll by Accountemps finds that 26% of CFO's say it’s never okay because people will perceive an employee who cries as weak or immature. Do you agree?
There’s no doubt that emotions can get the better of us on the job, but is it ever okay to show those emotions in the workplace? Well, a new survey sought to find the answer to that very question.
A new poll by Accountemps finds that 45% of people say they’ve cried at work, and it seems most bosses are okay with it, on occasion. When asked 44% of CFOs say crying in the office is acceptable as long as it isn’t something that happens every day. However, 26% say it’s never okay because people will perceive an employee who cries as weak or immature.
If an employee is crying an abnormal amount, it may seem uncomfortable to approach them. The easy thing to do would be to assume a back story for that individual that lets you off the hook from having to talk with him or her. However, if at all possible, approach that employee and talk with them about the situation through the lense of compassion. You could be missing out are an easy opportunity to really connect and build trust with your employee.
Obviously, if at all possible, it is always better to control your emotions. However, tears aren’t the only emotion folks can express on the job. This same survey found that 52% of workers have lost their temper at the office. There is not a good black and white answer to the "crying" questions. I think in this day in age; it is essential for managers to lead by example and, give people grace when needed.
Thinking Differently About the "Carrot and Stick" Management Style
There is not a one size fits all fix for any one group or organization. However, there are simple things that you can do that will help build a more positive relationship with you and your team, leading to better company culture and improvement of productivity.
A common question I hear is, "How do I improve the performance of my department?" There is not a one size fits all fix for any one group or organization. However, there are simple things that you can do that will help build a more positive relationship with you and your team, leading to better company culture and improvement of productivity.
Improving the relationship between you and your team is vital in how you grow a more positive culture. One of the biggest steps you can take is assessing the feedback that you give your team. The "carrot and stick" style of management is a common a widely used tactic for a lot of managers. I believe the widespread practice of the carrot and stick approach is because managers see the quick results and get to feel that their interactions played a role in the improvements. However, studies show that complimenting (carrot) an employee or reprimanding (stick) an employee based on his or her performance is a flawed thought process. If done incorrectly (which is easy to do), the carrot and stick method is cashing in on short-term solutions by damaging your department's long-term prospects on improved culture and performance.
I recently was talking with a manager about some negative feedback that he had received from his team in a recent evaluation. He didn't understand what he could do differently. "I'm supposed to be okay with my team underperforming?" he asked. Of course not. However, there is a proper tool for every task. I explained to him Dr. Daniel Kahneman's statistical regression to the mean study. Kahneman is a winner of the Nobel Prize for his work in economics. His study in regression proved that employees perform at a consistent level. In the study, no amount of criticism or praise would change the average employee's performance over a week or month.
Normally, this is when managers tend to cut me off. They have seen, first-hand that when they criticize an employee, the next day the employee's work improves. Even worse, the managers have been trained to stop using the carrot for the same reason. When they compliment an employee for a job well-done, they don't take into account the natural regression that occurs when the employee reverts to his or her average performance level. The regression leaves the manager feeling betrayed. "I just said you did a good job, and now you go backward." Unfortunately, because of the confirmation bias that criticism creates improvements in employees, many managers keep only that style of leadership.
A better approach to feedback is to understand that instead of only carrot and stick, there are different tools that you can use to have an active and constructive conversation. When an employee is having a below average day, calling him or her in is an effective relationship building tactic. Start by saying, "Hey, I noticed you are running a bit sluggish today, is everything all right?" Helping develop a positive interaction focused on the performance allows you the chance to analyze if this is just a bad day or a more systemic issue. Building a relationship with your employees does not mean that you have to be their best friend, but instead, look at each employee as more than what they do for your company. Making people feel heard, understood, and appreciated will build a better culture which leads to long-term growth and higher productivity.
Long term positive reinforcement is not an easy task, but honestly, even trying to cultivate positive relationships in the workplace goes a long way.
Conflict Is Not A Dirty Word
Conflict is a word that people want to avoid. Most managers and CEO ask me not to use the term conflict when talking with their team, instead opting for "issues", "miscommunications", and my favorite "areas of improvement". This course of action does a disservice to your staff's intelligence. In this day in age, it is more important than ever to be open genuine and open about what is happening in the office. Managers who cannot deal with terms such as conflict are likened to parents who awkwardly stumble through "The Talk" to their kids.
Conflict is not a dirty word; it is, however, a vital part of communication. I often tell people, if you're one of those couples who say, "Oh we never fight", that means someone has given up in the relationship. The art of a healthy relationship or organization isn't peace, but using conflict and constructive disagreement to form better decisions and opinions. Fear of conflict shows signs of mistrust, and a poor company culture.
I would recommend that managers, get past the fear conflict and embrace the productive and financial benefits of a constructive feedback loop inside your company. If you're having issues with conflict inside your office setting, feel free to reach out. I would enjoy the opportunity to help you have better a communication system.